Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434560›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2026

Teaching humanities in UK medical schools: towards community-building and coherence.

Richard T Bellis, Sally Frampton, Gina Hadley, Jennifer Wallis, Alan Bleakley, Gabriele De Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard T BellisUniversity of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. rtb8@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Sally FramptonUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sally.frampton@history.ox.ac.uk.
Gina HadleyUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK. gina.hadley@hmc.ox.ac.uk.
Jennifer WallisImperial College London, London, UK. j.wallis@imperial.ac.uk.
Alan BleakleyUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Gabriele De LucaUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical humanities teaching in UK medical schools has lacked cohesion, having developed opportunistically in different locations. Cohesion is necessary to develop an identifiable community of practice, but within that community there can be multiple readings of what 'medical humanities' are and how they may develop. This article details discussions held by medical humanities scholars teaching in UK medical schools at a workshop in January 2025 at the University of Oxford covering five key areas: the role of humanities scholars in medical schools, patients as partners in medical education, core curriculum teaching, intercalated teaching, and assessment. Our discussion highlights opportunities and challenges facing humanities teaching in UK medical schools today and calls for the creation of a community of medical humanities scholars working in UK medical education embracing diversity of opinion and practices. The article is specifically written as a synopsis of a brainstorming symposium.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, MedicalHumanitiesSchools, MedicalTeachingAcademiaCommunity of PracticeHumansUnited KingdomCurriculum designMedical educationMedical humanitiesPatient partnersProfessional networks

Identifiers

PMID40434560
PMCPMC13526092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.