ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Exploring program-cell death patterns to predict prognosis and sensitivity of cervical cancer immunotherapy via multi-omics analysis and clinical samples.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photodynamic therapy: a promising alternative for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) progression and therapeutic resistance are driven by metastatic dissemination and immune evasion. Although immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy, current biomarkers fail to adequately predict patient prognosis or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responsiveness. Programmed cell death (PCD) pathways are intricately linked to tumor-immune crosstalk, yet their systematic integration into predictive models remains unexplored in CC.
methodsWe constructed a prognostic gene model for PCD by mining the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), GEO, and Genecards databases. The predictive capability of the model was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A nomogram was generated through Cox regression. The model was validated in both training and testing cohorts. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry were used to verify the expression of the model genes. Finally, functional analysis of low- and high-risk groups based on the median risk score was performed, including immune infiltration, genomic mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and drug sensitivity.
resultsWe established a prognostic model based on six PCD-related genes: CD46, TFRC, PGK1, GNG5, GAPDH, and PLAU. The risk score demonstrated good performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values indicating strong predictive ability (TCGA: AUC 1-year = 0.761, AUC 3-year = 0.754, AUC 5-year = 0.803; GEO: AUC 1-year = 0.702, AUC 3-year = 0.632, AUC 5-year = 0.579). Higher risk scores were associated with poorer overall survival (OS). Additionally, low-risk patients exhibited increased immune cell infiltration, higher IPS scores, enhanced expression of PDCD1 and CTLA4, and greater sensitivity to Niraparib, Paclitaxel, and Cisplatin. qRT-PCR confirmed overexpression of CD46, TFRC, PGK1, GNG5, and PLAU in cervical cancer cell lines and tissues, with consistent findings in immunohistochemistry (IHC).
conclusionThis study establishes CDI as the PCD-based immune signature for CC, enabling precise prognosis prediction and ICI candidate selection. The CDI framework provides actionable insights for combination therapies targeting PCD-immune interplay, with translational potential for personalized oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.