Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434492›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2025

Guava leaf extract as a catalyst for enhanced rabbit health and performance in sub-tropical regions: an updated review.

A H Abd El-Aziz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A H Abd El-AzizDepartment of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhur, Egypt. ayman.sadaka@vetmed.dmu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-0011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For sustainable intensification of rabbit industry, it is imperative to explore the potential of non-conventional feed resources. The researchers were driven to discover solutions for the shortage of feed in livestock production because of the ongoing rise in costs associated with conventional feed resources. Their efforts were directed at enhancing conventional sources and investigating alternative feed sources, including agricultural and agro-based industrial by-products. Therefore, the review examines the possible advantages of using guava leaf extract (Psidium guajava) as an example of non-conventional feed additive to improve the growth performance and overall health of commercially raised rabbits. Guava leaf extract contains a high concentration of bioactive substances, such as antioxidants, vitamins, and vital minerals. These substances have demonstrated advantageous effects on the feed efficiency, growth rate, and overall health of rabbits. This review article provides a thorough analysis of the current understanding and updates the knowledge about the physiological effects of adding guava leaf extract to rabbit diets, with a specific emphasis on its economic benefits. The findings demonstrated notable enhancements in feed conversion efficiency, growth rate, and immune system functionality, coupled with reductions in the total lipids levels and pathogenic microorganisms. Potential avenues for future investigation encompass the refinement of dosage, examination of synergistic impacts with other dietary constituents, and implementation of extended studies to validate the enduring advantages.

Indexed as

Animal FeedPlant ExtractsPsidiumAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsPlant LeavesRabbitsPlant ExtractsGrowth performanceGuava leafHealth, economicImmunePathogenic microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID40434492
PMCPMC12119758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.