Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434479›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Current perspectives of telesurgery applications among different specialties: first multicentric and multispecialty retrospective study.

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Zhao Qun, Ma Yuntao, Cai Hui, Xia Dan, Wang Shuo, Liang Xiao, Wang Jun, Bernardo Rocco and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted remote radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on 5G communication technology (FUTURE-04): a prospective, single-arm clinical trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Telesurgery in Brazil: Opportunities, Responsibilities, and the Path Ahead.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Chiara SighinolfiFondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. mariachiara.sighinolfi@policlinicogemelli.it.
Marcio Covas MoschovasGlobal Robotic Institute, Adventhealth, Orlando, USA.
Zhao QunThe Fourth Hospital of Heibei Medical University Heibei Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Ma YuntaoGangsu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Cai HuiGangsu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Xia DanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Wang ShuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Liang XiaoZhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Wang JunThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Bernardo RoccoFondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Vipul PatelGlobal Robotic Institute, Adventhealth, Orlando, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telesurgery has recently emerged as a transformative technology with the potential to revolutionize surgical care with humanitarian and training opportunities. The advent of new robotic systems with telesurgical capabilities promoted the interest toward telesurgery; the Toumai (Microport, China) is among these new platforms and the only approved in Europe so far. The Toumai is a multiport robotic system with an immersive console and a single patient cart. The aim of the study is to report the largest series of telesurgical robotic procedures reported so far to prove the feasibility and safety of the technology. This is a multicenter cohort study on a series of patients who underwent robotic telesurgical procedures across China with the Toumai robotic system. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the safety of telesurgery measured as the need for conversion to local surgery or to different approaches. Furthermore, we reported the type of procedures performed and summarized the characteristics of connectivities. Overall, 66 overall surgeries-consisting of ten urological, 55 general, and one gynecological case-were performed with the Toumai across China, with an average distance of was 800, 220, and 300 km, respectively. No conversions to local surgery were recorded. The average delay time was 65, 34, and 61 ms for urological, general, and gynecological surgery, respectively. Apart from colecistectomies, gastric surgery (total gastrectomy, gastrowedge resection) and radical prostatectomies were the mostly performed interventions. Despite some issues needs to be addressed from a regulatory standpoint, technological and telecommunication advancements are willing to support the successful implementation of telesurgery; further series are expected to address the reproducibility of these outcomes in European countries.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTelemedicineAdultAgedChinaFeasibility StudiesFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUrologic Surgical ProceduresGeneral surgeryGynecologyLatencyRobotic surgeryTelesurgeryToumaiUrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.