Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434394›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Endogenous oscillatory rhythms and interactive contingencies jointly influence infant attention during early infant-caregiver interaction.

Emily A M Phillips, Louise Goupil, Megan Whitehorn, Emma Bruce-Gardyne, Florian A Csolsim, Navsheen Kaur, Emily Greenwood, Ira Marriott Haresign, Sam V Wass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social communication development in a contingent world: insights from autism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Leader-follower dynamics during early social interactions matter for infant word learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily A M PhillipsDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4244-6900
Louise GoupilCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Megan WhitehornDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma Bruce-GardyneDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Florian A CsolsimDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Navsheen KaurDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Emily GreenwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Ira Marriott HaresignDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Sam V WassDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-3493

Funding

European Research Council 853251 - ONACSALeverhulme Trust RPG-2018-281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost all early cognitive development takes place in social contexts. At the moment, however, we know little about the neural and micro-interactive mechanisms that support infants' attention during social interactions. Recording EEG during naturalistic caregiver-infant interactions (N=66), we compare two different accounts. Traditional, didactic perspectives emphasise the role of the caregiver in structuring the interaction, whilst active learning models focus on motivational factors, endogenous to the infant, that guide their attention. Our results show that, already by 12 months, intrinsic cognitive processes control infants' attention: fluctuations in endogenous oscillatory neural activity associated with changes in infant attentiveness. In comparison, infant attention was not forwards-predicted by caregiver gaze or vocal behaviours. Instead, caregivers rapidly modulated their behaviours in response to changes in infant attention and cognitive engagement, and greater reactive changes associated with longer infant attention. Our findings suggest that shared attention develops through interactive but asymmetric, infant-led processes that operate across the caregiver-child dyad.

Indexed as

AttentionCaregiversInfant BehaviorSocial InteractionChild DevelopmentCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantMalecontingencydyadicEEGhumaninfantneurosciencesocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID40434394
PMCPMC12119090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.