ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Peripheral Blur Perception in Young Children at Low Risk or High Risk of Myopia: Longitudinal Data.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Binocularity and Depth on Static and Dynamic Accommodation Responses in Young Children.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Accommodation in Young Children.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Peripheral sensitivity to blur may contribute to refractive error development. We assessed blur discrimination in the near periphery in emmetropic children (six to eight years) at low risk (LR, n = 48) or high risk (HR, n =43) for myopia over three years. Methods: A synthetic image with naturalistic image statistics was digitally blurred (pedestal blur) with either simulated defocus or primary spherical aberration (SA). One quadrant of the display was blurred by an additional amount (increment blur) and the subjects indicated that quadrant. Blur levels were adjusted using QUEST+ adaptive algorithm across three eccentricities (0°, 6°, 12°). Dipper functions were fit to proportions correct as a function of pedestal and increment blur to estimate intrinsic blur and blur criteria. Generalized mixed models were used to describe the effect of eccentricity, visit, and risk group on each blur measure. Results: There was no significant main effect of risk group, but intrinsic blur decreased significantly more over time in the HR group [defocus: -0.02 log (µm), P = 0.015; SA -0.03 log (µm), P = 0.005]. Intrinsic blur for defocus [0.11 log (µm), P < 0.001], but not SA, was higher for 6° than 0°. Intrinsic blur [defocus: 0.42 log (µm), P < 0.001; SA: 0.41 log (µm), P < 0.001], and blur criteria (defocus: 0.12 log, P < 0.001; SA 0.05 log, P = 0.001) were higher for 12° than 0°. Conclusions: Peripheral blur perception is impaired by elevated intrinsic blur and higher discrimination criteria compared to central vision in children at LR and HR for myopia, with larger transition between 6° and 12° eccentricity. Peripheral blur perception does not appear to be a predictive factor in myopia risk in this small group of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.