ArticleInternal medicine journal2025
Impact of generative artificial intelligence on the professional qualities curriculum and reflection essays during physician training.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The professional development curriculum is a vital component in physician training and is important for helping trainees develop as competent and reflective practitioners. The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) will likely have a significant impact on the assessment of the professional qualities curriculum in physician training. The development of professional qualities as well as self-reflection is currently assessed through personal reflection essays. These reflection essays are particularly vulnerable to new developments in generative AI, which are capable of producing high-quality outputs that can pass as trainee-created responses. Generative AI-produced reflection essays are becoming increasingly difficult to detect using AI-detection software. The challenge remains how best to incorporate AI into learning while safeguarding the attainment and assessment of learning goals within the multiple domains of professional development. This article discusses several options for safeguarding the professional qualities curriculum in medical education and vocational training. Discussion-based activities may very well prove to be a suitable potential replacement for the current professional reflection essay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.