Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434088›Full record

Trial reportClinical hemorheology and microcirculation2025

Value of blood perfusion index in guiding fluid resuscitation against septic shock.

Leqing Lin, Dongcheng Liang, Wanrou Yuan, Fengkai Mao, Baiyong Wang, Bin Wang, Wei Cao

RetractedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2025-11-23Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Third Party Involvement · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leqing LinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Dongcheng LiangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Wanrou YuanDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Fengkai MaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Baiyong WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Wei CaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveSeptic shock is a serious medical condition characterized by extreme inflammation and blood vessel permeability. Fluid resuscitation is a crucial treatment for septic shock, but the optimal approach for fluid management remains controversial. In this study, we explored how blood perfusion index (PI) monitoring can help direct fluid resuscitation therapy for septic shock.MethodsBetween January 2019 and December 2021, 50 patients with septic shock were admitted to The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University and randomly assigned to either a control or study group (25 cases each). All patients were given the sepsis treatment bundle recommended by the 2018 guidelines and were subjected to Pulse Indicator Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) -based hemodynamic monitoring. Fluid resuscitation was administered based on specific indicators in the control group. We used PI to direct fluid resuscitation in the research group. Several parameters were assessed, including blood lactate (BLAC), hemoglobin (Hb), stroke volume index (SVI), norepinephrine dosage, extravascular lung water (EVLW), volume of resuscitation fluid and the ICU mortality.ResultsThere were statistically significant reductions in BLAC in the study group compared to the control group 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after treatment (P < 0.05). In the study group, the SVI was higher 24 and 48 h post-treatment compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Norepinephrine doses were similarly lowered in the study group. In the comparison of extravascular lung water between the two groups, the extravascular lung water in the study group was less than that in the control group 24 h after fluid resuscitation, and the difference was statistically significant. the ICU mortality [44%vs. 56% (X

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyPerfusion IndexResuscitationShock, SepticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineNorepinephrinefluid resuscitationperfusion indexseptic shock

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.