Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434077›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.

Flavio Gössi, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Armon Arpagaus, Stefano Bassetti, Sabina Hunziker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavio GössiDepartment of Medical Communication/Psychosomatics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Divison of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Medical Polyclinic, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph Becker
Sebastian Gross
Armon Arpagaus
Stefano Bassetti
Sabina Hunziker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe daily visit by the treating doctor or medical team at the bedside of the hospitalized patient («rounds») is essential for patient-centered care and interprofessional exchange.

methodsThis narrative review is based on pertinent publications (up to December 2024) that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed/Medline database.

resultsBedside rounds are used to fulfill multiple tasks: medical, communicative, and educational. Complex social interactions, in particular, require precise and empathetic communication. 71% of patients say they primarily expect clear information about their medical situation. Information exchange can nonetheless be difficult, particularly with older and frail patients. So-called teach-back techniques improve patients' understanding of medications and behavioral instructions (OR 1.84 [1.09; 3.12] and 1.83 [1.07; 3.13], respectively). Although many patients would like to take active part in discussions on rounds, the physicians explicitly encouraged them to do so in only 54% of cases. If the team discusses the patient outside the room before entering, the patient's understanding of their condition is no different, but they are less likely to be confused by medical technology (21.3 versus 13.7); team satisfaction is higher (78.0 versus 68.3), and there is more opportunity to discuss sensitive topics (84.3 versus 59.3, each on a visual analog scale VAS 1-100).

conclusionInterprofessional discussion of the patient and suitable communication on rounds can improve patient care and are essential for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient CarePhysician-Patient RelationsTeaching RoundsHumansPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID40434077
PMCPMC12560264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.