ArticleDermatology reports2026
S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.