ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Can medical consortiums bridge the gap in health inequity in China? A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theme recognition and evolutionary analysis of older adults cognitive disorder prevention and control policies based on the BERTopic model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While health is a fundamental right, health inequities between urban and rural residents remain significant in China. Medical consortia aim to bridge this gap by providing equitable and affordable healthcare. However, their effectiveness in enhancing health equity remains underexplored. This study aims to explore whether medical consortia have mitigated health inequity between urban and rural residents. We employed propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias among 9918 electronic medical records. We focused on two key areas: the effectiveness of medical consortia in reducing healthcare burdens and their influence on health equity, as indicated by the disparities in medical expenses between urban and rural residents. To obtain more detailed insights, we segmented medical expenses into low, medium, and high categories for both urban and rural residents and examined how medical consortia differentially affect health equity across these segments. Moreover, we evaluated whether the differences in referral effects on medical expenses between urban and rural residents can be explained by their varying disease structures and age distributions. We found that medical consortia can significantly reduce the medical burden on populations, but have limitations in improving health equity. The findings highlight a substantial reduction in medical expenses for urban populations. However, no significant reduction was observed in rural populations, with the low-medical-expense group experiencing an increased healthcare burden following the implementation of medical consortia. These findings are robust across various matching methods. Despite reducing healthcare burdens, medical consortia have not equalized health outcomes between urban and rural residents. Significant differences in the disease and age structures exist between urban and rural residents, which may account for the differing causal effects observed between them. Policymakers must prioritize health equity in healthcare reform and consider targeted interventions to address the distinct healthcare challenges of different socioeconomic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.