ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Healthcare professionals' representation toward optimal palliative care provision for COPD patients: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-stakeholder perspectives of palliative care needs in advanced COPD: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition causing chronic physical symptoms, psychological burdens, as well as social consequences. This contributes to a major decrease in quality of life (QoL). Palliative care (PC) is a person-centered approach intended to relieve physical, psychological, social, and spiritual suffering. Despite international practice guidelines, patients with COPD have limited access to PC, mostly during end-of-life (EoL) care. It is therefore important to explore healthcare professionals' (HPs) point of view about PC to improve access for COPD patients to PC.
objectivesThis study aimed to describe the perceptions of HPs working with COPD patients in Switzerland in different settings on PC provision, implementation, access, and organization. Additionally, we aimed to identify gaps, barriers, training needs, and solutions for HPs related to PC needs.
designThis is a cross-sectional survey study with quantitative and open-ended questions.
methodsWe used an electronic survey sent to HPs working with patients suffering from COPD in the inpatient, outpatient, and home-based settings.
resultsA total of 56 out of 98 participants (57%) answered the questionnaire of which 41.1% were nurses. 47.2% of participants were uncertain about the good timing of addressing COPD patients to PC and did it after several acute exacerbations, during EoL, or at the request of the patient. 45.5% did not know the availability of a local specialized PC. Lack of skills/training was identified as one of the hindering factors to discuss EoL (42.9%
conclusionDespite recognizing the importance of PC, several barriers were identified, including a lack of knowledge about when to initiate a PC and limited utilization of tools for identifying PC needs. Multidisciplinary teamwork and the identification of a nurse coordinator could improve earlier referrals to PC and improve QoL for COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.