Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434003›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi-Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks.

Rui Nie, Caihong Zheng, Likun Ren, Yue Teng, Yaoyu Sun, Lifei Wang, Junya Li, Jun Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi-Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui NieChinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-5453
Caihong ZhengLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Likun RenChinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yue TengChinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yaoyu SunSchool of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Lifei WangDepartment of Chemistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Junya LiLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jun CaiChinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-9373

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program ASTIP-IAS03Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z210011National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFF1200904National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFD1300100National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFF0729204National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070795National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471512STI2030-Major Projects 2023ZD0404803Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA0460301Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDC0200000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell cycle structures vary significantly across cell types, which exhibit distinct phase compositions. Asynchronous DNA replication and dynamic cellular characteristics during the cell cycle result in considerable heterogeneity in DNA dosage, chromatin accessibility, methylation, and expression. Nonetheless, the consequences of cell cycle disruption in the interpretation of multi-omics data remain unclear. Here, we systematically assessed the influence of distinct cell phase structures on the interpretation of omics features in proliferating cells, and proposed solutions for each omics dataset. For copy number variation (CNV) calling, asynchronous replication timing (RT) interference induces false CNVs in cells with high S-phase ratio (SPR), which are significantly decreased following replication timing domain (RTD) correction. Similar noise is observed in the chromatin accessibility data. Moreover, for DNA methylation and transcriptomic analyses, cell cycle-sorted data outperformed direct comparison in elucidating the biological features of compared cells. Additionally, we established an integrated pipeline to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after cell cycle phasing. Consequently, our study demonstrated extensive cell-cycle heterogeneity, warranting consideration in future studies involving cells with diverse cell-cycle structures. RTD correction or phase-specific comparison could reduce the influence of cell cycle composition on the analysis of the differences observed between stem and differentiated cells.

Indexed as

Cell CycleGenomicsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationGene Expression ProfilingHumansMultiomicscell cycle compositionspseudo‐omics featuresS phase ratios

Identifiers

PMID40434003
PMCPMC12362787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.