Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433986›Full record

ReviewIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2024

Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.

Y He, J M Mulqueeney, E C Watt, A Salili-James, N S Barber, M Camaiti, E S E Hunt, O Kippax-Chui, A Knapp, A Lanzetti and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Identifying variation in dinosaur footprints and classifying problematic specimens via unbiased unsupervised machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Y HeL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7526
J M MulqueeneyL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-745X
E C WattL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-7105
A Salili-JamesAI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1125-2054
N S BarberL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-9672
M CamaitiL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-4586
E S E HuntL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-3479
O Kippax-ChuiL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4551-6281
A KnappL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-5623
A LanzettiL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-0544
G Rangel-de LázaroL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-0783
J K McMinnL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-9306
J MinusL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3968-4382
A V MohanL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-0665
L E RobertsL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-8667
D AdhamiL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
E GrisanSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-5652
Q GuAI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-6554
V HerridgeL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5204-8426
S T S PoonAI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-5400
T WestCentre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-3773
A GoswamiL ife Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9465-810X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize many aspects of science, including the study of evolutionary morphology. While classical AI methods such as principal component analysis and cluster analysis have been commonplace in the study of evolutionary morphology for decades, recent years have seen increasing application of deep learning to ecology and evolutionary biology. As digitized specimen databases become increasingly prevalent and openly available, AI is offering vast new potential to circumvent long-standing barriers to rapid, big data analysis of phenotypes. Here, we review the current state of AI methods available for the study of evolutionary morphology, which are most developed in the area of data acquisition and processing. We introduce the main available AI techniques, categorizing them into 3 stages based on their order of appearance: (1) machine learning, (2) deep learning, and (3) the most recent advancements in large-scale models and multimodal learning. Next, we present case studies of existing approaches using AI for evolutionary morphology, including image capture and segmentation, feature recognition, morphometrics, and phylogenetics. We then discuss the prospectus for near-term advances in specific areas of inquiry within this field, including the potential of new AI methods that have not yet been applied to the study of morphological evolution. In particular, we note key areas where AI remains underutilized and could be used to enhance studies of evolutionary morphology. This combination of current methods and potential developments has the capacity to transform the evolutionary analysis of the organismal phenotype into evolutionary phenomics, leading to an era of "big data" that aligns the study of phenotypes with genomics and other areas of bioinformatics.

Identifiers

PMID40433986
PMCPMC12082097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.