ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Interconversion and mechanisms between Lsm-type and Sm-type heteroheptameric rings: implications for spliceosome evolution and RNA metabolism.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A stand-alone ICln release module revealed by deconstructing the SMN complex with engineered Brr1.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotes harbor both Sm-type and Lsm-type heteroheptameric rings, which are essential in RNA metabolism. Despite their similar subunits and evolutionary ties, they interact with RNA in distinct ways, functioning as scaffolds and chaperones, respectively. However, the mechanistic basis of their evolutionary divergence remains unclear. Using the Sm ring (D1-D2-F-E-G-D3-B) and the Lsm2-8 ring, both of which form the cores of distinct spliceosomal snRNPs, as model systems, we investigated the feasibility and mechanisms of their interconversion. We found that the interactions among subcomplexes (SCs) 1-3 in the Sm ring (D1/D2, F/E/G, and D3/B) differ from those in Lsm2-8 (Lsm2/3, Lsm6/5/7, and Lsm8/4), implying the formation of distinct assembly intermediates. By strengthening the SC1-SC3 interaction, we achieved the conversion of the Sm ring into an Lsm-type ring. Conversely, increasing the SC2-SC3 affinity did not yield a successful conversion. Furthermore, by weakening the SC1-SC3 interaction and introducing mutations in the RNA-binding regions of SC1 and SC2, we converted Lsm2-8 into a Sm-type ring. These findings provide mechanistic insights into how similar protein components can assemble into functionally distinct heteroheptameric rings, a principle likely applicable to Lsm1-7 and the U7 snRNP core, and offer deep insights into spliceosome and eukaryotic evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.