ArticleNucleic acids research2025
3D genome organization shapes DNA damage susceptibility to platinum-based drugs.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic genome-wide mapping reveals how chromatin context shapes OGG1-mediated repair and related mutagenesis in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of DNA repair and mutagenesis induced by acetaldehyde, acrolein, aristolochic acids, and vinyl chloride.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Platinum (Pt) drugs are widely utilized in cancer chemotherapy. Although cytotoxic and resistance mechanisms of Pt drugs have been thoroughly explored, it remains elusive what factors affect the receptiveness of DNA to drug-induced damage in nuclei. Here, we demonstrate that nuclear locations of chromatin play a key role in Pt drug-induced DNA damage susceptibility in vivo. By integrating data from damage-seq experiments with 3D genome structure information, we show that nuclear locations of chromatin relative to specific nuclear bodies and compartments explain patterns of cisplatin DNA damage susceptibility. This aligns with observations of cisplatin enrichment in biomolecular condensates at certain nuclear bodies. Finally, 3D structure mapping of DNA damage reveals characteristic differences between nuclear distributions of oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage in drug resistant versus sensitive cells. DNA damage increases in gene-poor chromatin at the nuclear periphery, while it decreases in gene-rich regions located at nuclear speckles. This suggests a strategic redistribution of Pt drug-induced damage in nuclei during chemoresistance development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.