Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433934›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science2025

Nanotechnology for Mitigating Biological Cross-Contamination in Meat Processing.

Camila Cristina Vieira Velloso, Juliana Arriel Torres, Caue Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camila Cristina Vieira VellosoEmbrapa Instrumentation, São Carlos, Brazil.
Juliana Arriel TorresEmbrapa Instrumentation, São Carlos, Brazil.
Caue RibeiroEmbrapa Instrumentation, São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1164-8497

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne contamination remains a significant challenge in the meat industry, with biological cross-contamination threatening public health and product quality. Conventional preservation methods, such as chemical sanitizers, often suffer from limitations like toxic residues, volatilization, and the rise of microbial resistance. In this context, nanotechnology emerges as a transformative approach, leveraging the unique properties of nanomaterials, such as silver, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, copper, and silica nanoparticles, carbon quantum dots, and nanocellulose, to enhance antimicrobial potency, antioxidant activity, and shelf-life extension. This review critically examines nanoencapsulation systems as a key innovation, enabling the stabilization and controlled release of bioactive compounds like essential oils (e.g., carvacrol, thymol, eugenol) and flavonoids (e.g., naringenin). These systems not only prolong antimicrobial efficacy but also preserve sensory and nutritional attributes, aligning with consumer preferences for natural, safer, and minimally processed foods. Furthermore, the integration of nanomaterials into smart packaging and surface coatings demonstrates promise in real-time contamination monitoring and pathogen suppression. However, scaling these technologies necessitates rigorous toxicological evaluations to address potential nanoparticle migration and environmental impacts. By synthesizing recent advancements, this review underscores nanotechnology's potential to redefine meat preservation paradigms while advocating for standardized regulatory frameworks to ensure safe, sustainable implementation.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationFood HandlingMeatNanotechnologyAnimalsFood MicrobiologyFood PackagingFood PreservationHumansNanoparticlesbiological cross‐contaminationfood safetynanoencapsulationnanomaterialsshelf‐life extension

Identifiers

PMID40433934
PMCPMC12117993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.