Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433904›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Improving How Healthcare Staff Support the Psychological Well-Being of People Living With Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Co-Created Study.

Sarah Northcott, Amanda Comer, Abi Roper, Lydia Davis, Katerina Hilari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah NorthcottCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8229-5452
Amanda ComerCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-7319-781X
Abi RoperCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6950-6294
Lydia DavisCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-2798
Katerina HilariCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2091-4849

Funding

This study was funded by City St George's, University of London, via Participatory Research Funding and the Higher Education Innovation Funding.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAphasia, a language disability, is common following a stroke. People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed and isolated, yet due to their communication difficulties, healthcare staff find it challenging to support their emotional well-being. This study aimed to explore what people with aphasia and their families consider important when training healthcare staff to support their psychological well-being post stroke.

methodsWe ran co-design workshops with six stakeholders with lived experience: four people with aphasia and two family members. The content of the workshops was allowed to evolve in a collaborative manner, with an assumed equality between the facilitators and lived experience stakeholders. Workshop material was analysed using Framework Analysis. We then co-produced four films to raise awareness and train healthcare professionals.

resultsFive main themes from the workshops were: (1) interactions with healthcare staff that support psychological well-being (e.g., listening with empathy, seeing patients as people, hope and encouragement, kindness and knowledge of aphasia); (2) interactions with healthcare staff that damage psychological well-being (e.g., feeling told off, being talked about and not included, not feeling listened to, not being supported to communicate and not feeling treated like a human being); (3) experiences of psychological therapy and mental health services; (4) who should provide psychological support and (5) influencing healthcare practice. The four films emphasised the personal journeys of lived experience stakeholders and their accounts of interacting with healthcare staff. DISCUSSION: Lived experience stakeholders felt strongly that their messages should be heard by all healthcare staff, not just those who elect to go on specialist training courses. They considered that supporting emotional well-being is the responsibility of all staff within stroke care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with aphasia and family member stakeholders shaped all aspects of this study; outputs were allowed to evolve in response to their priorities. Initially, the researchers had anticipated that the focus would be on specialist training courses in psychological therapy; this shifted to a new focus on influencing how all healthcare staff interact with patients, including both non-clinical staff and staff who would not elect to go on a specialist training course. The co-produced films were a direct result of lived experience stakeholders' suggestions and priorities.

Indexed as

AphasiaHealth PersonnelStrokeAdultFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychological Well-Beingaphasiaco‐productionemotional recoveryhumanising carepsychological well‐being

Identifiers

PMID40433904
PMCPMC12117477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.