ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025
Fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Adherence to a Locally Adapted Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway and Perioperative Outcomes After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are abnormal dilatations of the aorta that most commonly affect its infrarenal segment, but can become more difficult to repair when they are close to or next to the renal arteries. The optimum treatment for these complex AAAs is unknown. One option is fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), which involves using fenestrations or scallops in the graft to facilitate access to the visceral arteries.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of complex stent-graft fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) or conservative (non-operative) management for people with complex AAAs. SEARCH
methodsThe Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov without language, publication year or publication status restrictions (published, unpublished, in press or in progress) on 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, comparing treatment of complex AAA with FEVAR versus open surgical repair or conservative management in adults undergoing primary repair of complex AAA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened studies obtained from the search for potential inclusion in the review, in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality (30 days and one year), aneurysm-related mortality at one year and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were renal dysfunction at one year, reintervention rate at one year, visceral vessel patency at 30 days and one year, participant-reported health-related quality of life at one year, adverse events at one year and aneurysm-related mortality at 30 days. MAIN
resultsWe found no studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe did not identify eligible RCTs or quasi-RCTs that compared treatment of complex AAAs with FEVAR versus open surgical repair or conservative management. This is a difficult area in which to conduct research due to low incidence rates and aneurysm heterogeneity. Future studies could consider commissioning agreements mandating patient inclusion in studies to make the generation of high-quality evidence in this area feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.