Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433852›Full record

ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Davina Daudu, Paris L Cai, Abhishekh Srinivas, Lawrence Mj Best, Jane Cross, Christopher J Hammond, Toby Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davina DauduDivision of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Paris L CaiAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull York Medical School, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Abhishekh SrinivasDepartment of Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lawrence Mj BestRadiology Department, Newcastle Hospital NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Jane CrossDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Christopher J HammondDepartment of Vascular Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Toby RichardsSchool of Health, Sport & Bioscience, University of East London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are abnormal dilatations of the aorta that most commonly affect its infrarenal segment, but can become more difficult to repair when they are close to or next to the renal arteries. The optimum treatment for these complex AAAs is unknown. One option is fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), which involves using fenestrations or scallops in the graft to facilitate access to the visceral arteries.

objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of complex stent-graft fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) or conservative (non-operative) management for people with complex AAAs. SEARCH

methodsThe Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov without language, publication year or publication status restrictions (published, unpublished, in press or in progress) on 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, comparing treatment of complex AAA with FEVAR versus open surgical repair or conservative management in adults undergoing primary repair of complex AAA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened studies obtained from the search for potential inclusion in the review, in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality (30 days and one year), aneurysm-related mortality at one year and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were renal dysfunction at one year, reintervention rate at one year, visceral vessel patency at 30 days and one year, participant-reported health-related quality of life at one year, adverse events at one year and aneurysm-related mortality at 30 days. MAIN

resultsWe found no studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe did not identify eligible RCTs or quasi-RCTs that compared treatment of complex AAAs with FEVAR versus open surgical repair or conservative management. This is a difficult area in which to conduct research due to low incidence rates and aneurysm heterogeneity. Future studies could consider commissioning agreements mandating patient inclusion in studies to make the generation of high-quality evidence in this area feasible.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalEndovascular ProceduresHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStentsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40433852
PMCPMC12117605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.