Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433758›Full record

ArticleRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2025

Human and Deep Learning Predictions of Peripheral Lung Cancer Using a 1.3 mm Video Endoscopic Probe.

Edoardo Amante, Robin Ghyselinck, Luc Thiberville, Rocco Trisolini, Florian Guisier, Valentin Delchevalerie, Bruno Dumas, Benoît Frénay, Inès Duparc, Nicolas Mazellier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edoardo AmanteDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Robin GhyselinckFaculty of Computer Science, NaDI, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Luc ThibervilleDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Rocco TrisoliniDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Interventional Pulmonology, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-4696
Florian GuisierDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Valentin DelchevalerieFaculty of Computer Science, NaDI, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Bruno DumasFaculty of Computer Science, NaDI, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Benoît FrénayFaculty of Computer Science, NaDI, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Inès DuparcDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Nicolas MazellierDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Cecile FarhiDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Christophe JubertDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Mathieu SalaünDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1430-6396
Samy LachkarDepartment of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIriscope, a 1.3 mm video endoscopic probe introduced through an r-EBUS catheter, allows for the direct visualisation of small peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). This study assessed the ability of physicians with different levels of experience in bronchoscopy, and the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict the malignant nature of small PPNs during Iriscope peripheral endoscopy.

methodsPatients undergoing bronchoscopy with r-EBUS and Iriscope for peripheral PPNs < 20 mm with a definite diagnosis were analysed. Senior and Junior physicians independently interpreted video-recorded Iriscope sequences, classifying them as tumoral (malignant) or non-tumoral, blind to the final diagnosis. A deep learning (DL) model was also trained on Iriscope images and tested on a different set of patients for comparison with human interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score were calculated.

resultsSixty-one patients with small PPNs (median size 15 mm, IQR: 11-20 mm) were included. The technique allowed for the direct visualisation of the lesions in all cases. The final diagnosis was cancer for 37 cases and a benign lesion in 24 cases. Senior physicians outperformed junior physicians in recognising tumoral Iriscope images, with a balanced accuracy of 85.4% versus 66.7%, respectively, when compared with the final diagnosis. The DL model outperformed junior physicians with a balanced accuracy of 71.5% but was not superior to senior physicians.

conclusionIriscope could be a valuable tool in PPNs management, especially for experienced operators. Applied to Iriscope images, DL could enhance overall performance of less experienced physicians in diagnosing malignancy.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyDeep LearningEndosonographyLung NeoplasmsAgedClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityVideo Recordingartificial intelligencebronchoscopydeep learningimagingperipheral pulmonary nodulesradial‐EBUS

Identifiers

PMID40433758
PMCPMC12437996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.