Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433705›Full record

ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2025

Occupational stress (KOSS®19): scale development and validation in the Korean context.

Hansoo Song, Hyoung Ryoul Kim, Inah Kim, Jin-Ha Yoon, Sang-Baek Koh, Sung-Soo Oh, Hee-Tae Kang, Da-Yee Jeung, Dae-Sung Hyun, Chunhui Suh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hansoo SongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyoung Ryoul KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Inah KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Ha YoonThe Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Baek KohDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Sung-Soo OhDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Hee-Tae KangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Da-Yee JeungDepartment of Dental Hygiene, Hanyang Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Dae-Sung HyunDepartment of Non-benefits Management, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea.
Chunhui SuhDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Sei-Jin ChangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Funding

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2018-OSHRI-790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) was developed in 2004. During this time, industrial structures have evolved, and societal awareness of occupational stress has changed. This study aims to develop and validate a revised version of the Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS®19), tailored for workers, reflecting these changes.

methodsThe KOSS®19 was developed based on the 26-item KOSS-short form (SF) through a review by eight experts. A survey was conducted including 359 service industry workers, comprising the KOSS®19, Burnout, and Depression scales. The KOSS®19 subscales were restructured, and their reliability and validity were evaluated.

resultsThe KOSS®19 composed of eight subscales: hazardous physical environment (2 items), high job demand (3 items), insufficient job control (2 items), low social support (2 items), job insecurity (2 items), organizational injustice (4 items), lack of reward (2 items), and work-life imbalance (2 items). The reliability and validity of the KOSS®19 were found to be satisfactory.

conclusionsThe KOSS®19 is a suitable tool for assessing occupational stress, effectively replacing the original KOSS and KOSS-SF.

Indexed as

BurnoutDepressionOccupational stressReliabilitySurveys and questionnairesValidity

Identifiers

PMID40433705
PMCPMC12315770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.