Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433687›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025

Effectiveness of the Ureteral Illuminating Catheter in Securing Adhesive Ureters in Robot-Assisted Ureteral Reconstruction.

Kazumi Taguchi, Shuzo Hamamoto, Kengo Kawase, Rei Unno, Atsushi Okada, Kentaro Mizuno, Tetsuji Maruyama, Takahiro Yasui

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of Lighted Urologic Guide Wires in Sialendoscopy: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kazumi TaguchiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-5114
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-7468
Kengo KawaseDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Rei UnnoDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0584-3712
Atsushi OkadaDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-3794
Kentaro MizunoDepartment of Pediatric Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-2009
Tetsuji MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-2477

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K09455Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K08763Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K08765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUreteral strictures, a common complication of ureteral stone treatment, pose substantial challenges. These conditions often necessitate robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction (RUR), a procedure complicated by difficulty in identifying and mobilizing adhesive ureters. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a ureteral illuminating catheter (IRIS U-kit) in enhancing visualization and securing adhesive ureters during RUR.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 24 patients who underwent RUR for stone-related ureteral strictures at two academic centers in Japan between April 2022 and June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: those with the IRIS catheter and those with conventional indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. The primary endpoint was a stent-free status with preserved renal function. Secondary outcomes included surgical time and postoperative recovery metrics.

resultsEach group included 12 patients during the study period. The IRIS catheter group demonstrated a 54% reduction in ureter securing time (38.0 vs. 82.5 min, p = 0.001) and a 33-min shorter console duration (144.0 vs. 177.0 min, p = 0.005) than the ICG group. All patients in both groups achieved a stent-free status by 6-7 weeks postoperatively, with no significant differences in serum creatinine levels or estimated glomerular filtration rates between the preoperative and postoperative periods. Additionally, both groups showed significant improvement in hydronephrosis, with moderate to severe grades decreasing from 41.7% preoperatively to 8.3% postoperatively.

conclusionThe IRIS catheter significantly enhanced the efficiency of RUR by improving the visualization of adhesive ureters without compromising the ability to observe other anatomical structures.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUreteral CalculiUreteral ObstructionAdultAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenJapanMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsIndocyanine Greenilluminating catheternear‐infrared fluorescence imagingrobot‐assisted ureteral reconstructionureteral reconstructionureteral stricture

Identifiers

PMID40433687
PMCPMC12410125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.