Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433652›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2025

Perceived Discrimination and Nicotine Product Use: Findings from a Youth and Young Adult Sample (2022-2023).

Elizabeth K Do, Karl Braganza, Kristiann Koris, Alexander P D'Esterre, Shreya Tulsiani, Elizabeth C Hair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth K DoSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3503-1731
Karl BraganzaSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
Kristiann KorisSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5451-1789
Alexander P D'EsterreSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-6719
Shreya TulsianiSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-7858
Elizabeth C HairSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study explores associations between perceived discrimination and nicotine product use. Data were collected from participants of the Truth Longitudinal Cohort, a national sample of youth and young adults. The analytic sample included participants surveyed between October 2022 to February 2023, who provided information on ever and past 30-day cigarette and e-cigarette use, perceived discrimination via the Everyday Discrimination Scale, and covariates (N = 5953). Multinomial logistic regression models were applied to the data to explore associations between perceived discrimination and nicotine product use. Results demonstrated that higher levels of perceived discrimination were associated with greater odds of current e-cigarette use, current or former cigarette use, current dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, former e-cigarette use, and former dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, relative to never users of cigarettes or e-cigarettes. Additional research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which perceived discrimination might influence use of nicotine products - especially given that associations were also found between gender identity, race and ethnicity, perceived financial situation, household smoker status, and sensation seeking with nicotine product use.

Indexed as

cigarettesdual usee-cigarettesnicotineperceived discriminationyoung adultsyouth

Identifiers

PMID40433652
PMCPMC12106984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.