ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Comparative Sedative Effects of Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexmedetomidine Alone in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor Surgery.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Esketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination on Immediate Postprocedural Oxygenation Index in Severe Pneumonia Patients Undergoing Bedside Fiberoptic Bronchoscopic Sputum Aspiration: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Comparative analysis of esketamine versus remimazolam in adult and pediatric surgical patients: a multimodal monitoring evaluation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Esketamine and dexmedetomidine are commonly used sedatives in surgery, which can result in minimal respiratory depression and analgesic activity. This study investigated the sedative effect of esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing spinal tumor (ST) surgery. Methods: We did a retrospective analysis at the Anesthesiology Department of Ningbo City's the sixth Hospital. They studied 75 ST surgery patients who got esketamine in combination with dexmedetomidine (Group ED) between April 2022 and June 2024. In a 1:1 cohort, compare these individuals to those who only received dexmedetomidine at the same time period (Group D). The primary outcome is perioperative hemodynamic status. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), and the occurrence of adverse responses. Results: Compared with group E, the group ED had lower mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores after the start of surgery (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the waiting time for perioperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and the intensity of the first induced MEP current between the two groups (all P>0.05); The Group ED first induced MEP amplitude, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude, and MEP amplitude greater than the Group D, while SEP latency and MEP latency were smaller than the Group D (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with dexmedetomidine alone, the combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine during ST surgery can demonstrated superior sedation and pain control without increasing adverse event risk, making it a viable alternative for ST surgery anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.