Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433629›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2025

The effect of

Daniela V Staton, Jonah Tang, Matthew Barbisan, Justin Nussbaum, Jonathon L Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela V StatonScience Research Institute, American Heritage School, Delray Beach, FL, USA.
Jonah TangDepartment of Biomaterial & Biomedical Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Matthew BarbisanDepartment of Biomaterial & Biomedical Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Justin NussbaumDepartment of Biology, Lakeland Community College, Kirtland, OH, USA.
Jonathon L BakerDepartment of Biomaterial & Biomedical Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5378-322X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although touted as a safer alternative to cigarette smoking, electronic cigarette usage has been increasingly linked to a myriad of health issues and appears to impact the oral microbiome. Meanwhile, nitrate supplementation has shown promise as a prebiotic that induces positive effects on the oral microbiome. Methods: In this pilot study, the impact of nitrate supplementation as a countermeasure to e-cigarette usage was explored using Results: The impacts of e-cigarette usage and beetroot supplementation were somewhat limited, with beetroot juice extract supplementation having a significant impact on diversity according to some, but not all, diversity metrics examined. The saliva of the e-cigarette users was depleted in nitrate-reducing Neisseria spp. In terms of differentially abundant individual taxa, the addition of beetroot juice extract to the saliva-derived microcosms had a larger impact on the communities derived from the e-cigarette users compared to that of the nonusers. Conclusions: Overall, this limited pilot study suggests that beetroot juice extract supplementation may impact the microbiota of e-cigarette users and adds to contemporary research paving the way for more in-depth studies examining the role of nitrate-rich supplements as prebiotics to promote oral health.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesnitrateoral microbiomeprebioticsaliva

Identifiers

PMID40433629
PMCPMC12107659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.