ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Optimizing
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mapping the Nitric Oxide Axis in IVF: Genotype Associations in Antagonist Cycles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nitric oxide (NO) plays a pivotal role in female reproductive processes, yet its clinical translation is limited by its short half-life and rapid systemic clearance. This study aimed to develop a stabilized NO delivery system to enhance oocyte maturation and quality for potential applications in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Methods: Lipid-based microbubbles (NO-MBs) were constructed via lyophilization to encapsulate and stabilize therapeutic NO gas. The effects of NO-MBs on in vitro oocyte maturation were evaluated using immature mouse oocytes, with conventional NO donors (e.g., SNP) as controls. Oocyte quality was assessed through Ca2+ levels, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Results: The key parameters of the optimized lipid-based microbubbles for NO gas delivery were as follows: particle concentration (2.23 × 10 Discussion: These findings highlight NO-MBs as a novel, clinically relevant strategy for targeted NO delivery in reproductive medicine. By optimizing NO release and bioavailability, NO-MBs offer a promising approach to improve oocyte quality and developmental outcomes in ART. Further studies are warranted to explore their broader applications in reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.