Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Virtual reality solution to promote adapted physical activity in older adults: outcomes from VR2Care project exploratory study.

Vincenzo De Luca, Malak Qbilat, Alessandra Cuomo, Antonio Bianco, Francesca Cesaroni, Chiara Lanari, Ad van Berlo, Telma Mota, Lucia Pannese, Michael Brandstötter and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vincenzo De LucaDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Malak QbilatInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), Porto, Portugal.
Alessandra CuomoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Antonio BiancoDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Francesca CesaroniCooperativa Sociale COOSS MARCHE ONLUS scpa, Ancona, Italy.
Chiara LanariCooperativa Sociale COOSS MARCHE ONLUS scpa, Ancona, Italy.
Ad van BerloSmart Homes, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Telma MotaAltice Labs, Aveiro, Portugal.
Lucia Panneseimaginary Srl, Milan, Italy.
Michael Brandstöttercogvis software und consulting GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Matthieu ArendseTante Louise, Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands.
Vania MotaVenerável Ordem Terceira de São Francisco do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Willeke van StaalduinenAcademy on Age-Friendly Environments in Europe (Afedemy), Gouda, Netherlands.
Hugo ParedesInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), Porto, Portugal.
Guido IaccarinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Maddalena IllarioDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Insufficient physical activity is one of the leading risk factors for death worldwide. Regular exercise can improve physical performance and quality of life, reduce the risks of falls and depressive symptoms, and reduce the likelihood of cognitive decline in older adults. Virtual reality (VR) and serious games (SG) are promising tools to improve physical and cognitive functioning. As part of the VR2Care project activities, four pilot sites explored the capabilities of the VR environment in a remote psychomotor training with SG and a hybrid approach with local groups of older adults performing physical activity. Objective: The present study aimed to explore and measure the impact on older adults' quality of life and physical activity of using VR2Care solution and the level of usability, satisfaction and acceptance. Methods: The study is a mixed method study, using qualitative and quantitative surveys to evaluate quality of life and physical activity of older users, and usability, satisfaction and acceptance of the solution. The data collection is a mix of investigator site data entry and users' self-reported data through the solutions or through online and paper-based means. Data were collected at baseline and after a follow-up of 6 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise stated. Within the group, baseline to end of observation differences were assessed by paired sample t-test. A Results: No significant improvements in quality of life and physical activity were found. Little improvement, although not significant, in physical activity was found, comparing the Total MET average value of users who participated in phase I and II, therefore using SmartAL and Rehability. Little improvement, although not significant, in physical activity applies in ≥76 population. Users' feedback on usability, satisfaction and acceptance of VR2Care is generally positive. VR2Care was appreciated mostly for its usefulness in managing physical activity and the capacity to influence the consistency of attending physical activity sessions as prescribed by doctors. Conclusion: Our results suggest that randomized controlled trial will be needed to assess correlations between specific features of the solution and health outcomes.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionVirtual RealityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo Gamesdigital healthgaminghealth promotionolder adultsphysical activitytelemonitoringvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40433492
PMCPMC12106364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.