Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Global, regional, and national analyses of the burden among adult women of breast cancer attributable to diet high in red meat from 1990 to 2021: longitudinal observational study.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Burden of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias Attribute to Metabolic Risks in Western Europe From 1990 to 2023.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- The impact of early exercise intervention on the incidence and severity of lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Burden of colon and rectum cancer attributable to a diet high in red meat in the United States, 1990-2021.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Dietary attribution to burden of chronic disease in Australia: a systematic analysis of the Australian Institute of health and welfare 2024 national burden of disease dataset.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Global trends and health workforce analysis of breast cancer burden from high red meat consumption 1990-2050 using machine learning approach.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The association between red meat consumption and breast cancer risk has been well established; however, it is crucial to understand the temporal trends, geographical variations, and socio-demographic factors that influence this risk among women aged 25-45. Consequently, this study seeks to investigate the impact of red meat consumption on breast cancer risk among adult women for the first time. Methods: Data were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study to calculate age-standardized rates (ASR) for mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Trends were assessed using estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) with linear regression analysis. Hierarchical clustering identified temporal trends, and examined the relationships between EAPC, ASR, DALYs, and the socio-demographic index (SDI). Results: Our findings indicate that breast cancer-related deaths and DALYs attributable to high red meat consumption increased globally, rising from 44,492 deaths and 1,379,721 DALYs in 1990 to 79,956 deaths and 2,407,092 DALYs in 2021. In high SDI regions, age-standardized mortality (-1.47%) and DALYs (-1.48%) rates declined, while low-middle and high-middle SDI regions showed significant increases. Low SDI regions, despite lower absolute numbers, experienced sharp relative increases in both deaths and DALYs. Additionally, a nonlinear relationship between ASR and SDI was observed, with the burden peaking in moderate SDI regions. Conclusion: This study concludes the rising global burden of breast cancer in adult women associated with high red meat consumption, with particularly pronounced impacts in low and middle SDI regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.