Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433485›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis of herpes zoster vaccination for adults aged 50 years in Zhejiang province, China.

Fuxing Chen, Linglin Ding, Yu Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fuxing ChenInstitute of Immunization and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.
Linglin DingInstitute of Immunization and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.
Yu HuInstitute of Immunization and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Live-attenuated zoster vaccine (LZV) and adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) have been approved for use in China. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of these two herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination strategies in a birth cohort of individuals aged 50 years. Methods: The cost-effectiveness of RZV and LZV was compared to no vaccination strategy using a lifetime Markov model from a societal perspective. Model parameters were obtained from up-to-date published literature and statistical data. The costs associated with vaccination and medical treatment, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), the number of herpes zoster and related complication cases averted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: Compared to the no-vaccination strategy, the RZV strategy was estimated to prevent 4,126 HZ cases and 772 postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) cases, while the LZV strategy was estimated to avert 2,355 HZ cases and 467 PHN cases. The ICER was estimated at 711.46 US $/QALY and 914.62 US $/QALY for the RZV and LZV strategies, respectively. Conclusion: HZ vaccination could provide significant health benefits at a reasonable cost. RZV was predicted to be more cost-effective than LZV.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccinationChinaCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticQuality-Adjusted Life YearsHerpes Zoster Vaccineadjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccinecost-effectivenessherpes zosterlive-attenuated zoster vaccinevaccination

Identifiers

PMID40433485
PMCPMC12106458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.