ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
The development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in three members of the same family: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer-related death among women globally. Familial cases of cervical cancer highlight the potential role of genetic factors in its development. This study aims to present a clinical case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) affecting a woman and her two daughters. Case description: This report describes a familial case involving three patients diagnosed with cervical lesions: (1) Patient A: A 27-year-old woman presented with complaints of postcoital bleeding. She was diagnosed with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, CIN3). Radiowave conization of the cervix was performed, and histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of CIN3. (2) Patient B: A 25-year-old woman, the sister of Patient A, also presented with contact bleeding. She was similarly diagnosed with HSIL (CIN3). A radiowave conization procedure was performed successfully, with histopathological analysis confirming the diagnosis. (3) Patient C: A 52-year-old woman, the mother of Patients A and B, was diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL, CIN1) following cytological examination. She declined further diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Genetic testing for all three patients revealed the presence of risk alleles associated with cervical cancer predisposition (rs10175462, rs1048943, rs4646903) and the absence of protective genotypes. Discussion: Familial cases of CIN are rare and suggest a potential genetic predisposition to the disease. The identification of common genetic polymorphisms underscores the role of hereditary factors in cervical cancer pathogenesis. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating family history and genetic assessments into screening, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Conclusion: This case highlights the significant influence of genetic factors in the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. It underscores the need for further research to enhance strategies for early detection, prevention, and management of cervical cancer in individuals with elevated genetic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.