ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Multipurpose prevention technologies for the prevention of unintended pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infections: regulatory pathways and challenges.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Preclinical Evaluation of a Dual-Drug Implant for Long-Acting HIV Prevention and Contraception.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Bridging HIV prevention and sexual reproductive health services in the context of multi-method PrEP: a qualitative study exploring provider perceptions in South Africa.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are multi-indication products commonly focusing on the prevention of unintended pregnancy, HIV, and/or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). MPTs have the potential to simplify product use and service delivery with reduced clinic visits, thus supporting improved product uptake, effective use, and cost-effectiveness. MPTs are complex products that typically include multiple active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), with two or more indications, and often use a device to deliver these APIs. These complexities create challenges when seeking regulatory approval. Products with previously approved APIs may be able to rely on bioequivalence (BE) studies, but still face challenges in formulation variation, drug-drug interaction, and fulfilling strict standards. MPTs that use new APIs and devices cannot rely on BE studies for approval and thus face further uncertainty, including clinical trial design for products with multiple indications and outcomes of interest. Efficacious standards of care for HIV prevention and contraception also necessitate active-control designs for registrational clinical trials, thus innovative trial designs may be needed. Compounding these challenges are special regulatory requirements for combination products, in addition to standards applied to individual API and device. Possible approval pathways for combination products exist within the US Food and Drug Administration and other global regulatory authorities, but their complexities and challenges are untested for MPTs. They are highlighted in this article to raise awareness around regulatory pathways for MPTs. In Sub-Saharan Africa, women of reproductive age are the largest percentage of new HIV infections. This, in combination with considerable rates of unintended pregnancy and rising sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates, highlights the need for products that address these complex sexual and reproductive health needs. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) commonly focus on the prevention of unintended pregnancy, HIV, and/or other STIs in one product. MPTs combine the use of multiple pharmaceutical drugs and often a medical device to address these interrelated challenges. This creates complications in the design of studies for MPTs and in understanding the process of approval from regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of health products, and in MPTs this is complicated by targeting the prevention of multiple indications, with differing study designs and challenges, in one product. There are mechanisms in place at some regulatory authorities to evaluate MPTs, but these pathways are untested by product developers and regulatory authorities alike. Some of these pathways are highlighted below. Collaboration between diverse stakeholders like regulators, academics, product developers, and community members is necessary to build consensus on the best steps to address these challenges. MPTs are a potential tool to successfully prevent interrelated sexual and reproductive health concerns, but regulatory challenges must be addressed for safe and effective products to reach those who need them most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.