ReviewJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Assessment Factors for Managing First Permanent Molars in Children with Poor Prognosis: A Systematic Mapping of Clinical Evidence.
Review in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Orthodontic management in patients diagnosed with molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and epidemiological studies.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Managing the first permanent molar (FPM) with a poor prognosis can be challenging as it depends on several modifying factors that must be considered, and each approach has potential implications and clinical outcomes. Aim: This review aimed to systematically review the assessment factors that should be considered prior to managing FPM with poor prognosis in children. Methods: A computerized database search was conducted using Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus with predefined search terms related to "management, treatment, extraction, restoration, endodontic, and orthodontic" involving the "FPM." The search included studies published in English between 1990 and 2024. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed whether the studies met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria specified management approaches for FPM with poor prognosis in children aged 6-16. Any disagreement between reviewers was resolved through discussion. Results: A total of 1815 studies were screened, and 37 full-text articles were retrieved. Seven retrospective observational studies met the inclusion criteria. All the included studies focused on orthodontic assessment factors, such as the presence of a third molar and angulation of the second permanent molar, aimed at achieving spontaneous space closure following FPM extraction. However, no studies have addressed restorative perspectives on managing this problem, particularly in pediatric patients. Conclusion: This review highlights a lack of well-established and robust studies on managing poor prognosis in FPM. The absence of research on long-term functional outcomes, patient-reported experiences, and the role of restorative alternatives, especially in children, reveals significant gaps in the current literature. Incorporating these findings into clinical practice could lead to more personalized and effective treatment strategies that focus on both immediate and long-term oral health outcomes for children. Given the complexity of FPM management, a multidisciplinary approach combining restorative, orthodontic, and preventive strategies is crucial. Therefore, further studies with stronger evidence are needed to explore a comprehensive clinical approach that could enhance treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.