ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Postoperative Complications After Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Clinical Observational Study On Dental Position And Risks.
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Accuracy comparison between active robot and freehand techniques in modified mid-segment-first extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: an in vitro study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study examined the associations between the position of impacted mandibular third molars and postoperative complications, with a focus on pain, swelling, and their associations with proximity to the mandibular canal. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 270 patients who underwent surgical extraction of mandibular third molars was analyzed. Preoperative panoramic radiographs were evaluated by three experienced surgeons to classify the tooth position (Winter classification) and proximity to the mandibular canal (Rood and Shehab classification). Postoperative complications (pain, swelling, trismus, paresthesia, hematoma, and hemorrhage) were assessed via standardized questionnaires and clinical records 7 days postoperatively. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Mesioangular and horizontal impactions were significantly associated with increased postoperative pain and swelling. Logistic regression indicated that the mesioangular position increased the odds of pain by 95% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95) and swelling by 85% (OR = 1.85). The horizontal impact increased the odds of pain by 2.8 times (OR = 2.8) and swelling by 5.0 times (OR = 5.0). Tooth position was a significant predictor of postoperative complications ( Conclusions: The position of impacted mandibular third molars, particularly mesioangular and horizontal angulations, significantly influences postoperative pain and swelling. These findings highlight the importance of considering the tooth position in surgical planning to reduce complications. Although panoramic radiography is useful in resource-limited settings, cone-beam computed tomography is advised for complex cases or when vital structures are at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.