ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025
Individual, household structure, and socioeconomic predictors of COVID-19 testing and vaccination outcomes: a whole population linked data analysis.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family typology among Mexican families after the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Estimating excess mortality during the Covid-19 pandemic in Aotearoa New Zealand.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic produced social inequities in health outcomes between and within nations. Reported inequitable COVID-19 outcomes for ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples are likely to be associated in part because of poorer socioeconomic circumstances experienced by these populations. Understanding these associations within national populations is vital for future pandemic management. Objective: This study explores the social inequity of COVID-19 outcomes within New Zealand over the first 3 years of the pandemic. We aimed to identify policy amenable socioeconomic factors associated with COVID-19 outcomes while adjusting for relevant individual factors and household structure. We also aimed to examine whether ethnic group differences are smaller when accounting for these socioeconomic factors and household structure. Methods: Administrative individual-level data for the New Zealand population was analysed to assess COVID-19 health outcomes during 2020 - 2023. The association between individual (e.g. age, ethnicity, disability status), household structure (e.g. household composition) and socioeconomic (e.g. crowding, housing quality, deprivation) factors and four COVID-19 health outcomes - infection, hospitalisation, mortality, and vaccination status was assessed. Results: Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities experienced worse outcomes across most COVID-19 outcomes. Adjusting for household structure and socioeconomic factors reduced but did not eliminate these inequities between ethnic groups. Housing issues including high housing mobility, poor quality housing, and household crowding were associated with worse outcomes, as were disability status, no primary health care enrolment, lower household income and older age. The size of these effects also differed for different health outcomes. Conclusions: Ethnic inequity was persistent and likely partly explained by policy-modifiable social factors, despite the relatively minor population health impacts of COVID-19 in New Zealand. We also demonstrate how a range of socioeconomic determinants predict COVID-19 outcomes in different ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.