SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- The serum platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes in bladder cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Preoperative Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Recurrence and Recurrence-Free Survival in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Across Different Intravesical Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A multidimensional nomogram integrating immune, inflammatory, and coagulation markers for personalized prognosis in bladder cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- The role of hematological biomarkers as diagnostic tool in pre-cancerous patients.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Prognostic Nutritional Index enhances risk stratification and predicts progression-free survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Establishment and evaluation of novel prognostic biomarkers based on systemic coagulation-inflammation index and related genes in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A nomogram based on the red cell distribution width to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic tool for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio for three-year survival in patients with early esophageal cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of inflammatory markers and different treatment regimens in neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven analysis of antibody and nucleic acid biomarkers for enhanced disease diagnostics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains controversial despite numerous investigations. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in NMIBC. Materials and methods: An extensive systematic search was executed utilizing four major electronic databases: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The prognostic significance of PLR was assessed using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. Forest plots were used to present data visualization and statistical summaries, illustrating the effects of individual studies and the reliability of the pooled results. Funnel plot analysis and Egger's test were employed to evaluate the potential presence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the pooled findings. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. Results: Eleven retrospective studies encomprising 3,566 patients met the inclusion criteria. Elevated PLR notably correlated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=2.132, 95% CI: 1.146-3.967, p=0.017) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.732, 95% CI: 1.174-2.554, p=0.006). No statistically meaningful correlation emerged in cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=1.218, 95% CI: 0.800-1.854, p=0.358) or overall survival (OS) (HR=1.350, 95% CI: 0.611-2.983, p=0.459). Publication bias was detected in RFS analyses (Egger's test, P=0.010). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled results were robust. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified geographic differences and patient characteristics as key sources of heterogeneity in RFS outcomes. Subgroup analysis indicated that geographic differences and sample size were potential sources of heterogeneity in PFS results. Discussion: This study comprehensively analyzed 11 studies and 3,566 NMIBC cases and found that elevated PLR was significantly associated with poorer RFS and PFS, suggesting that PLR can be used as a prognostic biomarker for the management of NMIBC. The prognostic value of PLR may be related to immune regulation and inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment; nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate its mechanism and establish its clinical application. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that elevated PLR serves as an independent predictor of poor PFS and RFS in NMIBC patients. As a cost-effective biomarker, PLR shows promise in risk stratification and treatment planning. However, large-scale prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized cut-off values. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024621307
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.