Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433346›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2023

Differentiating Between Septic Arthritis and Lyme Arthritis in the Pediatric Population.

Carlos D Ortiz, James Barsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos D OrtizRenaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
James BarsiStony Brook University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Stony Brook, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Septic arthritis and Lyme arthritis are two conditions that can present with similar symptoms, making it challenging to differentiate between them in a clinical setting. While septic arthritis often requires immediate surgical intervention, Lyme arthritis can often be managed effectively with antibiotic therapy alone. However, given the dangerous nature of untreated septic arthritis, accurate diagnosis and timely intervention are crucial in managing the condition, especially in the pediatric population. Efforts to distinguish between the two conditions include the use of laboratory tests, history and physical exam findings, and MRI imaging. The authors aim to explore the causes, presentation, and treatment of septic versus Lyme arthritis as well as to provide a summary of the evolving research in this area and propose an algorithm that can aid in diagnosis. By synthesizing the proposed algorithm in diagnosis, clinicians will be better equipped to manage septic versus Lyme arthritis effectively while avoiding invasive procedures such as joint aspiration. Key Concepts: •Septic arthritis is a medical urgency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to achieve positive clinical outcomes.•Arthritis is a late-stage symptom of Lyme disease that can be challenging to distinguish from septic arthritis.•Laboratory tests, a thorough history & physical exam, and MRI imaging can aid in diagnosis and help clinicians manage these conditions without resorting to invasive procedures like arthrocentesis.•While septic arthritis usually requires joint drainage, Lyme arthritis can be managed effectively with antibiotic therapy.

Identifiers

PMID40433346
PMCPMC12088124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.