Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433305›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Developing a predictive model for septic shock risk in acute pancreatitis patients using interpretable machine learning algorithms.

Binglin Song, Ping Liu, Kangrui Fu, Chun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Binglin SongClinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8913-7172
Ping LiuEmergency Department, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3563-9670
Kangrui FuEmergency Department, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7707-4767
Chun LiuEmergency Department, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is a severe complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), often associated with poor prognosis. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis and develop an interpretable early prediction model for septic shock in these patients using machine learning (ML). The model is intended to assist emergency physicians in resource allocation and medical decision making. Methods: Data were collected from the MIMIC-IV 3.0 database. The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was performed using LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression. Subsequently, 10 ML models were developed: Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Machine, Neural Network, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), K-Nearest Neighbor, Adaptive Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Category Boosting, and Support Vector Machine. To enhance and optimize model interpretability, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were employed. Results: A total of 1032 patients with AP were included in this study, from which 31 variables were selected for model development. By comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis results between the training and test sets, the XGBoost model demonstrated a significant advantage over other models. SHAP analysis revealed that white blood cell count, total bilirubin (bilirubin total), and bicarbonate (HCO Conclusion: ML approaches exhibited promising performance in predicting septic shock in patients with AP. These models may aid in guiding treatment decisions for patients with AP in the emergency department.

Indexed as

Acute pancreatitismachine learningseptic shockShapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)

Identifiers

PMID40433305
PMCPMC12107010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.