ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024
Use of paralytic agents during the operative treatment of type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children: A single-center investigation and survey of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America members.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paralytic agents are occasionally used during the surgical treatment of type III (OTA 13A2) supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFx) in children depending on surgeon preference. Paralytic agents create a neuromuscular blockade and therefore may potentially help with ease of fracture reduction. Controversy regarding the use of a paralytic agent as an adjunct to anesthesia exists due to potential associated adverse drug reactions, including prolonged paralysis, cardiovascular effects, or electrolyte abnormalities.The purpose of this study was to investigate intraoperative paralytic use in pediatric type III SCHFx and to report survey responses of members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) on paralytic use in SCHFx management. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 319 type III SCHFx treated at our institution (January 2016-May 2019). Patients were assigned to 3 groups: group 1, surgical treatment without a paralytic agent ( Results: Average patient age was 5.2 ± 2.2 years. Group 2 had significant increases in anesthesia duration, surgical duration, fluoroscopic time, and radiation exposure compared to group 1. Group 2 had a higher conversion rate to open reduction than other groups. No statistically significant difference was found among groups in terms of sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, radiographic measurements, or rates of open procedures or complications. Survey results indicated 32% (24/76) routinely use paralytics during closed reduction maneuvers; 71% (17/24) request administering paralytics at the beginning/before the case; and 33% (8/24) use paralytics in all type III SCHFx. Conclusions: Surgeons at our center reported paralytic use for closed reduction in 25% of patients; similarly, one-third of POSNA survey respondents reported paralytic use during operative management. Although paralytic agents are used during the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children this study was unable to demonstrate an association of advantageous outcomes, such as shorter surgical times. Routine paralytic use to facilitate closed reduction of supracondylar humerus fractures in children warrants further study. Key Concepts: (1)Paralytic agents may be utilized in pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture (SCHFx) surgeries, but their efficacy remains controversial due to associated adverse reactions.(2)Administration of rocuronium during surgery was associated with prolonged anesthesia and surgical durations, as well as increased fluoroscopic time and radiation exposure, suggesting potential drawbacks to its use.(3)Despite common use, the study found no significant correlation between paralytic agent administration and beneficial outcomes such as shorter surgical times.(4)Survey responses revealed varying practices among orthopaedic surgeons regarding paralytic agent use during closed reduction maneuvers for SCHFx.(5)Understanding variations in paralytic agent use among orthopaedic surgeons underscores the importance of future research to guide clinical decision-making.(6)The study highlights the need for standardized protocols and evidence-based practices in the use of paralytic agents for pediatric SCHFx.(7)The findings underscore the need for further research to establish the efficacy and safety of routine paralytic use in pediatric SCHFx surgeries and inform standardized protocols. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective chart review; Therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.