Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433255›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024

Who owns the waste created in orthopaedic surgery?

Laura L Bellaire, Brittany N Garcia

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura L BellaireDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brittany N GarciaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The health care industry creates tremendous amounts of waste and emissions, and operating rooms are the single largest contributor. Single-use devices and other disposable plastic products have become a mainstay in modern hospital culture, particularly in the United States and other high-income countries. The creation and disposal of such items have major impacts on the environment and disproportionately affect vulnerable populations globally. Review: Waste is a difficult term to define, and its meaning varies depending on cultural context and associated economic implications. The disposal, reprocessing, and recycling of waste streams particularly hazardous waste are energy intensive. Practices differ considerably across health systems depending on local guidance, incentives, and regulations. Governing and regulatory bodies disagree in their opinions and policies regarding the safety and reusability of medical equipment and products. Conclusions: Accountability and ownership of health care waste continue to be somewhat ambiguous. Identifying stakeholders and potential opportunities for optimization and clarification is imperative. Auditing waste, designing scalable interventions, and innovation will be keys to reducing our contributions to environmental degradation. Significant economic implications and potential cost savings have been demonstrated when health care waste is reduced. Such savings can motivate the creation of lean, green operative practices and systems. Orthopedic surgeons have a unique, powerful opportunity to lead the way in thoughtful actions and innovation in this area. Key Concepts: (1)Health systems generate tremendous amounts of waste, and roughly 1/3 of this originates in operating rooms.(2)A throwaway culture and fear of contamination has led to increasing reliance on disposable and single use items-a trend that drives mounting costs, waste, and vulnerability to supply chain disruptions without clear benefit to patients.(3)Accountability for undue waste belongs to surgeons, health systems, industry, and society as a whole, but current regulations and guidelines surrounding waste classification, ownership, and disposal remain unclear and vary across health systems and locations.(4)Orthopaedic surgeons play an active role in waste generation by way of their instrument and product utilization; they can and should take ownership of existing opportunities to reduce overconsumption and promote reuse and recycling where appropriate.

Indexed as

Carbon footprintCircular economyRecycleSingle-use devicesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40433255
PMCPMC12088212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.