ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment Protocol: Nasolabial Fold Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Chinese Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Gel of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Nasolabial Folds by Ligament-targeted Injection.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Causes contributing to nasolabial fold (NLF) appearance can be multifactorial, hence requiring distinct dermal filler strategies. We devised 4 assessment, strategy, and treatment (AST) injection protocols, incorporating NLF etiology and severity, patient expectations, and the selection of Belotero Balance Lidocaine (BBL) and Belotero Volume Lidocaine (BVL) hyaluronic acid fillers. Methods: The underlying etiology and photonumeric assessments of NLF severity guided protocol selection. In protocol 1, the NLF was injected directly with BBL into the mid-to-deep dermis and/or immediate subdermal plane. In protocol 2, BVL was injected using dual-plane sandwich technique into the canine fossa and subcutaneous layers. Protocol 3 combined indirect injections of BVL into the deep medial cheek fat compartment and preauricular hollows to lift ptotic soft tissue, followed by direct NLF injections with protocols 1 and 2. In protocol 4, BVL was injected into the temple and/or jawline, in combination with midface augmentation (AST protocol 3) and direct NLF injections (AST protocols 1 and 2) to fully address all underlying etiologies contributing to NLF appearance. Results: AST protocols facilitate treatment customization to each patient's NLF etiology and severity through direct and indirect approaches. At 30 days, NLF severity improved visibly and satisfactorily. Improvements varied from effacement of superficial nasolabial wrinkles to shallower NLF depth, improvement in cheek projection and nasojugal groove appearance, and smoother submalar contours. Conclusions: The AST protocols provide a strategic reference for combining BBL and BVL in a personalized patient-centric approach for effective, holistic, and balanced NLF corrections and pan-facial aesthetic improvements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.