ArticleCJC open2025
Individualized Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures As a Communication Aid in Outpatient Cardiology Care: A Study Protocol.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06164457 (Implementing Individualized Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Individualized Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) quantify patients' perspectives about their health and well-being, their functioning (emotional, physical, mental, and social), and their health-related quality-of-life. The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment (APPROACH) developed an ePROM clinical report that includes 4 validated PROM instruments (Seattle Angina Questionnaire, 7-item version [SAQ-7], Patient Health Questionnaire, 2-item and 9-item [PHQ-2 & PHQ-9], Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey [MOS SSS], EuroQol Group 5-level assessment [EQ-5D-5L] and the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the APPROACH ePROM clinician report as an adjunct to the care of patients with established coronary artery disease. Utilizing a pre-post interventional study design, we evaluate the APPROACH ePROM tool in 4 outpatient cardiology practices in Alberta over 8 months. A total of 80 patients in the preintervention period and 120 patients in the intervention period will be recruited to participate, and each patient will contribute a single visit. Study outcomes will be evaluated using ePROM usage metrics, and a post-visit survey for both physicians and patients, a single exit interview for physicians, and focus groups for patients. Outcomes will be the feasibility and acceptability of the ePROMs report, as well as its efficacy, based on comparison of measures of physician-patient communication between groups. The pilot will allow us to better understand the possible limitations and facilitators of the study, to guide their further evaluation (full-scale trial) and dissemination. This pilot trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06164457).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.