ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Impact of chemical interventions on reducing dengue, Zika, and chikungunya: a systematic review.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Chikungunya: Hidden risks of anti-mosquito chemicals.Eco-Environment & Health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Given that vector control represents the primary strategy for preventing these diseases, the objective of this systematic review is to ascertain the efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing their burden. Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for experimental studies published between 1987 and 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Medline, Embase, WOS-Core Collection, Scopus, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, and Biological Science Database were consulted to identify studies using incidence or prevalence as outcome variables of interest. Results: Of the 2 232 references initially retrieved, 8 articles were included in the review. All studies used entomological indices along with disease burden indices to measure intervention impact. Three studies evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated curtains alone, one combined those with residual insecticide treatment in dwellings, one evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated school uniforms, and the remaining three evaluated household insecticide application. Only four of the eight articles showed some level of efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing dengue prevalence or incidence. Conclusion: The chemical interventions under examination did not result in a notable reduction in the burden of these diseases within the population, which would appear contradictory given the prominent role of chemical interventions in vector-borne disease control programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.