ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Assessing the RNA integrity in dry seeds collected from diverse endangered species native to the USA.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring the change in deleterious mutation burden of barley germplasm conserved over one regeneration cycle.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Aging and longevity in decades-old genebanked seeds from U.S. endangered plant species: Assessments using survival and RNA integrity assays.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Molecular timekeepers: the curious alliance of redox, repair, and protective proteins in preserving seed longevity.Crop health · 2026Review
- Accumulating Heterozygous Deleterious Mutations in Conserved Soybean Germplasm over Successive Regenerations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing the viability of genebanked seeds from rare, wild plants native to the United States using the D.E.A.D. paradigm.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dry seeds do not show obvious signs of life and so testing for viability, health and life expectancy can be challenging. Usually testing seed quality involves adding water and measuring metabolic capacity or growth potential by vital staining or germination assays. Importantly, most laboratory seed tests are intended to assay immediate viability, while most genebanks need tests that predict seed performance in the distant future. All currently available assays require considerable a priori knowledge of germination conditions and seeds large enough to dissect. Germination conditions are often unknown for seeds produced from wild species and are an important criterion for seed testing. Methods: Using standardized methods (i.e., commercially available kits) we tested the feasibility of adapting a new seed quality assay that measures RNA integrity and is promising for cultivated species, to seeds from wild species. Most of the 100 wild species we include are rare or endangered and in need of preservation through genebanking. To determine the feasibility of measuring RNA integrity in seeds from wild populations, we compared the quality of RNA extracted from seeds that were recently harvested to those of the same species that have been genebanked for 16 to 41 years, with various seed traits examined for interference with RNA extraction and characterization. Results: We demonstrate reliable characterization of RNA quality across a diverse group of plants, despite variation in germination requirements, seed morphology or composition. RIN (RNA Integrity Number) values were usually high across all samples and variables, attesting to both the quality of newly collected material as well as its maintenance under genebanking conditions. This study conclusively demonstrates the feasibility of reliably extracting and characterizing RNA from dry seeds collected from wild populations, regardless of a variety of seed traits and morphologies. Relationships between RNA quality and seed age and viability require further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.