Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Assessing the RNA integrity in dry seeds collected from diverse endangered species native to the USA.

Hannah M Tetreault, Zoe Zingerman, Lisa Hill, Shaimaa Ibrahim, Joyce Maschinski, Katherine D Heineman, Christina Walters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah M TetreaultUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Zoe ZingermanUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Lisa HillUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Shaimaa IbrahimUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Joyce MaschinskiCenter for Plant Conservation, Escondido, CA, United States.
Katherine D HeinemanCenter for Plant Conservation, Escondido, CA, United States.
Christina WaltersUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dry seeds do not show obvious signs of life and so testing for viability, health and life expectancy can be challenging. Usually testing seed quality involves adding water and measuring metabolic capacity or growth potential by vital staining or germination assays. Importantly, most laboratory seed tests are intended to assay immediate viability, while most genebanks need tests that predict seed performance in the distant future. All currently available assays require considerable a priori knowledge of germination conditions and seeds large enough to dissect. Germination conditions are often unknown for seeds produced from wild species and are an important criterion for seed testing. Methods: Using standardized methods (i.e., commercially available kits) we tested the feasibility of adapting a new seed quality assay that measures RNA integrity and is promising for cultivated species, to seeds from wild species. Most of the 100 wild species we include are rare or endangered and in need of preservation through genebanking. To determine the feasibility of measuring RNA integrity in seeds from wild populations, we compared the quality of RNA extracted from seeds that were recently harvested to those of the same species that have been genebanked for 16 to 41 years, with various seed traits examined for interference with RNA extraction and characterization. Results: We demonstrate reliable characterization of RNA quality across a diverse group of plants, despite variation in germination requirements, seed morphology or composition. RIN (RNA Integrity Number) values were usually high across all samples and variables, attesting to both the quality of newly collected material as well as its maintenance under genebanking conditions. This study conclusively demonstrates the feasibility of reliably extracting and characterizing RNA from dry seeds collected from wild populations, regardless of a variety of seed traits and morphologies. Relationships between RNA quality and seed age and viability require further exploration.

Indexed as

genebanknative seedsRNA integrityseed agingseed qualityviabilitywild plant populations

Identifiers

PMID40433160
PMCPMC12106311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.