Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40433153›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Beyond bloom: validated marker-trait discovery for polyploid roses via GWAS.

Laurine Patzer, Dietmar Frank Schulz, Amarachi Queendaline Ezeoke, Marcus Linde, Thomas Debener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurine PatzerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Department Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Dietmar Frank SchulzInstitute of Plant Genetics, Department Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Amarachi Queendaline EzeokeInstitute of Plant Genetics, Department Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Marcus LindeInstitute of Plant Genetics, Department Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Thomas DebenerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Department Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breeding roses with ideal ornamental characteristics such as beautiful flowers, a pleasant fragrance, and attractive growth habits is complex and time-consuming. This process can be improved and accelerated through the use of molecular markers. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on nine ornamental traits in roses using the RhWagSNP chip across a panel of 285 cultivars and varieties. Significant marker-trait associations found for major quantitative trait loci were further validated using single-marker analyses with PACE technology in independent panels of up to 182 genotypes. Results: For six traits- 'Young shoot: intensity of anthocyanin coloration', 'Stem: number of prickles', 'Leaf: glossiness of upper side', 'Flower: number of petals', 'Flower: fragrance', and 'Petal: length'-we identified and validated marker-trait associations for major QTLs. Conversely, we were unable to validate associations for 'Leaf: anthocyanin coloration' and 'Leaf: intensity of green color on the upper side', and found no significant associations in the GWAS for 'Leaf: size'. Loci that affect petal size, petal number and fragrance have been previously studied. We were able to detect associated markers with increased effect sizes for all three traits. Even greater effects were observed when we combined markers from independent loci for petal number and fragrance. Discussion: Associated markers for some of the analysed traits largely colocalise with markers previously identified in QTL analyses of biparental populations. Our validation strategy using PACE as an alternative marker technology in independent panels and different environments supports the robustness of our data, irrespective of our limited panel sizes. For the six traits for which we could validate marker-trait associations, our data can be interpreted cautiously as indicating high complexity of inheritance, with few large-effect QTLs influencing the traits. For the other four traits, either greater genetic complexity and/or stronger environmental effects may have confounded our analyses. We believe that the markers presented here can serve as valuable tools for marker-assisted selection and for further genetic analysis of the traits we have analysed.

Indexed as

breedinggenome-wide association studiesMASmolecular markerspolyploidQTLrose ornamental traitsSNP array

Identifiers

PMID40433153
PMCPMC12106473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.