ArticleCJC open2025
Dual Pathway Inhibition in Patients with Atherosclerosis with or without Heart Failure: Insights from the XATOA Registry.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Acting RNA Interference Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Current Evidence and Emerging Targets.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease might benefit from dual pathway inhibition (DPI) therapy, which includes rivaroxaban and aspirin. Patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) are a subgroup with a higher risk for ischemic events. Accordingly, we explored the risks and benefits of DPI therapy in a generalizable population of patients with concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and HF. Methods: The Results: Of 5532 participants, 4022 (72.7%) had documentation of HF status. Of those 873 (21.5%) had a history of HF (EF > 40%, 461; EF ≤ 40%, 181, EF unknown, 231). Over a median follow-up of 465 days (interquartile range, 372-576), the primary outcome occurred in 4.9% of participants with HF compared with 2.4% in those without HF (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.41). The safety outcome was similar in patients with and without HF (0.9% vs 1.11%; a hazard ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.67). Conclusions: In a generalizable cohort of patients with atherosclerotic disease and HF, the use of DPI therapy is associated with outcomes similar to those observed in recent randomized controlled clinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.