ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Analysis and assessment of biomedical scientists' needs for clinical laboratory: activity-based management as an evaluation methodology.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare systems have to protect citizens' health by developing models combining concepts of efficiency, effectiveness and quality of care. The post-Covid-19 pandemic context has highlighted the relevance of efficiently managing and allocating human resources. In this scenario, the analysis and calculation of personnel needs take on strategic importance. The project aims to suggest a methodology to define the needs of Biomedical Scientists. The goal is to create a standard model adaptable to different contexts. Methods: This project, developed in cooperation with the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology, has created a new format following the "Activity Based Management" approach. It is characterized by continuous improvements, based on analysis of processes, broken down into sub-processes and activities. After the phase of format development, a phase of application to different contexts, such as biochemistry and the hematology sectors, followed. Results: The suggested methodology allows to estimate the number of Full Time Equivalents necessary for the management of the laboratory processes. Furthermore, an objective and analytical data is obtained, because it is based on timely numerical surveys that included productivity and execution times of the different activities. Discussion: Using the format had a relevant impact on the analysis of the processes, their efficiency, and their possible improvement. This method allowed to evaluate and improve the analytical and "extra-production" activities, often underestimated but having a decisive role in the process. The proposed format can be considered a valid tool for laboratory managers to analyze and evaluating the needs of Biomedical Scientists in the laboratory. Activity Based Management allowed us to obtain precise and objective data and, at the same time, to focus on the main objective of any clinical laboratory: to create value for the patient by supporting diagnosis and treatment of paths through safe and reliable laboratory tests, which depends on a correct allocation of human resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.