ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
Transarterial Chemoembolization, Molecular Targeted Treatments, and Programmed Death-(Ligand)1 Inhibitors, for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Lung Metastasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lung metastases are diverse, requiring a personalized approach. Current CNLC guidelines recommend systemic therapy and focal radiation, emphasizing the roles of molecular targeted treatments (MTT) and programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors. However, the efficacy of combining TACE with these treatments remains uncertain. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of TACE combined with MTT and PD-(L)1 versus MTT and (PD-[L]1) in patients with HCC and lung metastasis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients treated between January 2019 and May 2024 at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University and West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Stabilized inverse probability weighting was employed to reduce bias. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Among 167 patients, 141 received TACE, MTT, and PD-(L)1, while 26 received MTT and PD-(L)1. The median follow-up times were 28 and 29 months, respectively. After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The median OS was significantly longer in the TACE group (15 months) compared to the MTT group (8 months; p=0.023), and PFS was also longer (8 months vs 5 months; p=0.038). For liver lesions, ORR was 42.6% in the TACE group and 46.2% in the MTT group (p=0.73); for lung lesions, ORR was 26.2% and 19.2%, respectively (p=0.449). Safety profiles were similar, except for a higher incidence of rash in the MTT group. Conclusion: TACE combined with MTT and PD-(L)1 demonstrated better outcomes for patients with liver cancer and lung metastases compared to MTT and PD-(L)1 alone, without increasing complication rates, suggesting a promising first-line treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.