ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Enhanced early rehabilitation and pain management with all-arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: A comparative study.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arthroscopically Assisted Double-Bundle Reconstruction Technique for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Enhanced early rehabilitation and pain management with all-arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: A comparative study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of femoral tunnel location, post-operative pain management, functional rehabilitation and clinical outcomes in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using all-arthroscopic technique. Methods: Between 2020 and 2021, 160 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation undergoing MPFL reconstruction were categorized into control (traditional surgery) and study (all-arthroscopic technique) groups. Femoral tunnel accuracy was assessed via computed tomography scans, pain management, functional rehabilitation, knee range of motion and daily activities were evaluated up to 6 months post-operatively. Knee function was assessed using Kujala and Lysholm scores at post-operative 12 months. Results: Seventy-one patients in the control group and 69 patients in the study group reached the final follow-up with no demographic differences. Follow-up duration was 12.65 ± 0.68 vs 12.77 ± 0.73 months in the control and study groups ( Conclusions: The all-arthroscopic technique for MPFL reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation ensures precise femoral tunnel placement. It offers advantages in early post-operative pain management and functional recovery, enabling faster rehabilitation compared to traditional non-all-arthroscopic techniques. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.