Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432978›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

The Technical Quality of Preclinical Tooth Preparation by Undergraduate Dental Students.

Sami A Almohefer, Rana K Alkattan, Ghadah D Aldakhayel, Fatimah F Alolaiqi, Lamia H Alharbi, Ahmed A Madfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sami A AlmoheferDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rana K AlkattanDepartment of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4473-3594
Ghadah D AldakhayelCollege of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah F AlolaiqiCollege of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-8619-635X
Lamia H AlharbiCollege of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed A MadfaDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6124-0129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tooth preparation is a fundamental technical skill in dentistry, demanding accuracy, careful attention to detail, and a comprehensive knowledge of dental anatomy. Pre-clinical training allows dental students to cultivate and enhance these abilities prior to conducting procedures on real patients. This research seeks to assess the quality of tooth preparation carried out by dental students in their pre-clinical training. Methods: A total of 221 artificial typodont teeth were used for simulated tooth preparations for a full contour ceramic crown by fourth-year pre-clinical dental students in a simulated dental environment (n=111 males and 110 females). Jaw models were mounted on phantom heads during the tooth preparation procedure. The tooth preparations were evaluated using standardized criteria, including 1.5-2 mm lingual, facial, axial and occlusal reductions, 6-10 degrees of axial wall taper, marginal integrity and surface smoothness. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results as either acceptable or unacceptable. Results: The majority of the students showed unacceptable occlusal reduction (89.6%). For axial reduction, the majority of students showed unacceptable results, recorded in 99.5% and 98.6% on the mesial and distal sides, respectively. Unacceptable facial and lingual reductions were noted in 93.7% and 77.4%, respectively. The taper angle on the mesial and distal sides was acceptable in 53.8% and 57.5%, respectively. About 56.6% of the dental students demonstrated acceptable marginal placement during preparation. Moreover, satisfactory finishing and rounded angles of the preparation were done by 68.3% and 58.4% of the students, respectively. Conclusion: The results revealed that most students achieved unsatisfactory results. This study underscores the importance of continuous assessment and tailored teaching strategies to enhance the quality of tooth preparation during pre-clinical training.

Indexed as

dental studentseducationpreclinical educationprosthodonticSaudi Arabiatooth preparation

Identifiers

PMID40432978
PMCPMC12109595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.