Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432862›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025

It's Just a Fingertip! Yet Controversy Exists: Standardizing a Treatment Pathway for Pediatric Fingertip Injuries.

Hilton P Gottschalk, Niamh D McMahon, Karen Piper, Karla Lawson, Andrea Bauer, Sonia Chaundhry, Julie Samora, Krister Freese, Christine A Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hilton P GottschalkDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Niamh D McMahonDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Karen PiperDell Children's Trauma and Injury Research Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Karla LawsonDell Children's Trauma and Injury Research Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Andrea BauerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sonia ChaundhryConnecticut Children's Medical Center, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.
Julie SamoraDepartment of Orthopedics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Krister FreeseDepartment of Orthopedics, Shriners Children's Hospital, Portland, OR, USA.
Christine A HoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric fingertip injuries are very common; however, treatment varies greatly depending on geographic location and surgeon. A paucity of data exists on how emergency department practitioners and hand surgeons should treat these injuries. We sought to develop consensus around treatment guidelines for these injuries. Methods: We conducted a Delphi survey of self-identified pediatric hand surgeons. Participants answered care delivery questions about 11 scenarios of fingertip injuries. These included minor (e.g., <50% subungual hematomas without fractures) to severe injuries (e.g., complete to near-complete partial tip amputations). Each question was answered on a 3-point Likert scale and included inquiry about antibiotic use, clinical consults, treatment methods, and need for hand surgeon follow-up. The second round of Delphi asked the participants to view round-one responses and reanswer questions that had moderate kappa values (kappa = 0.40-0.69) to attempt to reach consensus. Results: Thirty-four surgeons took the first round of Delphi survey. Questions in each scenario ranged from very high to very poor levels of agreement. All but one scenario contained at least one question with moderate agreement allowing for resurvey and consensus building. Thirty-three (97%) of the same surgeons completed the second round. In the 11 scenarios, there were 22 questions resurveyed. Of those 22 questions, 17 (77%) changed to higher levels of consensus with a kappa ≥0.70, allowing consensus of expert opinion to be reached on 45 treatments. Conclusions: The panel reached consensus on when to use intravenous (IV), oral (PO) or no antibiotics for various scenarios of pediatric fingertip injuries. Clarification was achieved on the standard treatment and follow-up practices for multiple clinical scenarios. Further work is required to achieve expert consensus for management of multiple clinical scenarios. Key Concepts: (1)Fingertip traumas are commonly seen in pediatric emergency rooms with treatments varying widely depending on the region of care.(2)Oral (PO) antibiotics are recommended for a tuft fracture with nailbed displacement, a Seymour fracture, or during partial amputation without loss of vascularity, whereas IV and PO antibiotics are indicated for complete and near-complete amputation.(3)Hand surgeon consultation was recommended for Seymour fracture, partial amputation of the distal phalanx, and complete or near-complete amputation with loss of vascularity.(4)Further research needs to be done to achieve consensus on treatment of some traumas. Level of Evidence: V, Expert Opinion.

Indexed as

Crush injuriesFingernail traumaFingertip injuriesOrthopaedicsPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID40432862
PMCPMC12088324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.